Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative analysis on the phase margin of ADRC

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Control Theory and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyzes and compares the phase margins of four active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) designs, which are based on different common-used extended state observers (ESOs) of various orders, for second-order systems. The quantitative results indicate that, besides good dynamic response, ADRC can guarantee enough phase margin. It is also proved that by decreasing the order of ESO, the phase margin can be increased. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the phase margins of the ADRC-based systems can be almost uninfluenced by the uncertainties of the system parameters. Finally, the theoretical results are verified by both simulations and experiments on a motion control platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han, J. (1995). The extended state observer of a class of uncertain systems. Control and Decision, 10(1), 85–88 (in Chinese).

  2. Han, J. (1998). Auto-disturbance rejection control and its applications. Control and Decision, 13(1): 19C23 (in Chinese).

  3. Han, J. (2009). From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(3), 900–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xue, W. C., Madonski, R., Gao, Z. Q., Huang, Y., & Lakomy, K. (2017). Add-on module of active disturbance rejection for set-point tracking of motion control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 53(4), 4028–4040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, L., Li, D., Hu, K., et al. (2016). On tuning and practical implementation of ADRC: A case study from a regenerative heater in a 1000MW power plant. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(23), 6686–6695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiang, G. F., Huang, Y., Yu, J. R., et al. (2018). Intelligence evolution for service robot: An ADRC perspective. Control Theory and Technology, 16(4), 324–335.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, Q., & Gao, Z. Q. (2018). Active disturbance rejection control: Some recent experimental and industrial case studies. Control Theory and Technology, 16(4), 301–313.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Madonski, R., Ramirez-Neria, M., Stankovic, M., et al. (2019). On vibration suppression and trajectory tracking in largely uncertain torsional system: An error-based ADRC approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 134, 106300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao, S., Gao, G., & Gao, Z. (2021). On multi-axis motion synchronization: The cascade control structure and integrated smcCadrc design. ISA Transactions, 109, 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuo, Y., Mei, J., Jiang, C., et al. (2021). Linear active disturbance rejection controllers for PMSM speed regulation system considering the speed filter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 36(12), 14579–14592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, Y., & Xue, W. C. (2014). Active disturbance rejection control: Methodology and theoretical analysis. ISA Transactions, 53(4), 963–976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, B. Z., Wu, Z. H., & Zhou, H. C. (2016). Active disturbance rejection control approach to output-feedback stabilization of a class of uncertain nonlinear systems subject to stochastic disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(6), 1613–1618.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, S., Bai, W. Y., Hu, Y., et al. (2020). On the conceptualization of total disturbance and its profound implications. Science China Information Sciences, 63(2), 129201.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong, S., Huang, Y., & Guo, L. (2020). A parameter formula connecting PID and ADRC. Science China Information Sciences, 63(9), 192203.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, W., & Zhao, T. (2021). An active disturbance rejection control for hysteresis compensation based on neural networks adaptive control. ISA Transactions, 109, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tian, G., & Gao, Z. Q. (2007). Frequency response analysis of active disturbance rejection based control system. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control, pp. 1595-1599. Singapore.

  17. Xue, W. C., & Huang, Y. (2015). Performance analysis of active disturbance rejection tracking control for a class of uncertain LTI systems. ISA Transactions, 58, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, D., & Chen, K. (2013). Frequency-domain analysis of nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control via the describing function method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(9), 3906–3914.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong, S., Huang, Y. (2019). Comparison of the phase margins of different ADRC designs. In: Proceedings of the Chinese Control Conference, 1280-1285. Guangzhou, China.

  20. Yoo, D., Yau, S. T., & Gao, Z. Q. (2007). Optimal fast tracking observer bandwidth of the linear extended state observer. International Journal of Control, 80(1), 102–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, W., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, M. (2021). Phase leading active disturbance rejection control for a nanopositioning stage. ISA Transactions, 116, 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, D., & Chen, K. (2009). Design and analysis of precision active disturbance rejection control for noncircular turning process. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(7), 2746–2753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao, Z. Q. (2003). Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 4989-4996. Denver, CO, USA.

  24. Carter, B. (2009). Op Amps for Everyone. 3rd edition. Newnes.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to express their grateful thanks to Professor Zhijun Yang from Guangdong University of Technology for providing the experimental platform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Huang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0703800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U20B2054).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, S., Huang, Y. Quantitative analysis on the phase margin of ADRC. Control Theory Technol. 21, 4–15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-023-00128-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-023-00128-z

Keywords

Navigation