quotation:[Copy]
Yutao Zhao1,2,Yi Huang1,2,Zhiqiang Gao3.[en_title][J].Control Theory and Technology,2023,21(1):16~33.[Copy]
【Print page】 【Online reading】【Download 【PDF Full text】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←Previous page|Page Next →

Back Issue    Advanced search

This Paper:Browse 588   Download 0 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
On tuning of ADRC with competing design indices: a quantitative study
YutaoZhao1,2,YiHuang1,2,ZhiqiangGao3
0
(1 Key Laboratory of Systems and Control, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Center for Advanced Control Technologies, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA)
摘要:
Controller optimization has mostly been done by minimizing a certain single cost function. In practice, however, engineers must contend with multiple and conflicting considerations, denoted as design indices (DIs) in this paper. Failure to account for such complexity and nuances is detrimental to the applications of any advanced control methods. This paper addresses this challenge heads on, in the context of active disturbance rejection controller (ADRC) and with four competing DIs: stability margins, tracking, disturbance rejection, and noise suppression. To this end, the lower bound for the bandwidth of the extended state observer is first established for guaranteed closed-loop stability. Then, one by one, the mathematical formula is meticulously derived, connecting each DI to the set of controller parameters. To our best knowledge, this has not been done in the context of ADRC. Such formulas allow engineers to see quantitatively how the change of each tuning parameter would impact all of the DIs, thus making the guesswork obsolete. An example is given to show how such analytical methods can help engineers quickly determine controller parameters in a practical scenario.
关键词:  Uncertain systems · Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) · Design indices (DIs) · Extended state observer (ESO)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-023-00136-z
基金项目:This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0703800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U20B2054).
On tuning of ADRC with competing design indices: a quantitative study
Yutao Zhao1,2,Yi Huang1,2,Zhiqiang Gao3
(1 Key Laboratory of Systems and Control, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Center for Advanced Control Technologies, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA)
Abstract:
Controller optimization has mostly been done by minimizing a certain single cost function. In practice, however, engineers must contend with multiple and conflicting considerations, denoted as design indices (DIs) in this paper. Failure to account for such complexity and nuances is detrimental to the applications of any advanced control methods. This paper addresses this challenge heads on, in the context of active disturbance rejection controller (ADRC) and with four competing DIs: stability margins, tracking, disturbance rejection, and noise suppression. To this end, the lower bound for the bandwidth of the extended state observer is first established for guaranteed closed-loop stability. Then, one by one, the mathematical formula is meticulously derived, connecting each DI to the set of controller parameters. To our best knowledge, this has not been done in the context of ADRC. Such formulas allow engineers to see quantitatively how the change of each tuning parameter would impact all of the DIs, thus making the guesswork obsolete. An example is given to show how such analytical methods can help engineers quickly determine controller parameters in a practical scenario.
Key words:  Uncertain systems · Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) · Design indices (DIs) · Extended state observer (ESO)